William Marrion Branham, 27 Sept 1958. Branham Tabernacle, Jeffersonville, Indiana, USA.

Sermon title (excerpt from tape recording): Why Are We Not A Denomination?

"In 1933…the vision of the Lord came to me up here and predicted that, Germany would rise up and have put that Maginot Line there. Many of you remember. And how they’d be all fortified in there, and the Americans would take a great beating right there at that line. It also said what would take place, and about Roosevelt and them things, how he would run and make that fourth term. Perfectly, just exactly the way it come to pass. And also said that cars would keep getting more like an egg, until the last days they’d be just in the shape of an egg.
Now, I said, "It’ll come to pass that those cars will not be run by a steering wheel; it’ll be something another run." It’s them cars they’re bringing out right now, remote control, for safety. Correct. You won’t be able to enter into a city then, a twenty-mile zone, you can just go twenty mile. You can’t hit another car, because it’s remote control. See, it’s going like that right now.
And I said, "Remember, in that day, before the end time comes, before the end time comes, that a woman… Now, you all keep this wrote down. There’ll be a great powerful woman raise up, either be President, or dictator, or some great powerful woman in this United States. And She’ll sink under the influence of women. Now, you remember; that’s THUS SAITH THE LORD."

—————————————————————————————————-

Source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Driverless_car#International

Driverless car

The driverless car concept embraces an emerging family of
highly automated cognitive and control technologies, ultimately aimed
at a full "taxi-like" experience for car users, but without a human
driver. Together with alternative propulsion, it is seen by some as the main technological advance in car technology by 2020.

Driverless passenger programs include the 800 million ECU EUREKA Prometheus Project on autonomous vehicles (1987-1995), the 2getthere passenger vehicles (using the FROG-navigation technology) from the Netherlands, the ARGO research project from Italy, and the DARPA Grand Challenge from the USA. For the wider application of artificial intelligence to automobiles see smart cars.

History

The history of autonomous vehicles starts in 1977 with the Tsukuba Mechanical Engineering Lab in Japan. On a dedicated, clearly marked course it achieved speeds of up to 30 km/h (20 miles per hour),
by tracking white street markers (special hardware was necessary, since
commercial computers were much slower than they are today).

In the 1980s a vision-guided Mercedes-Benz robot van, designed by Ernst Dickmanns and his team at the Universität der Bundeswehr in Munich, Germany, achieved 100 km/h on streets without traffic. Subsequently, the European Commission began funding the 800 million Euro EUREKA Prometheus Project on autonomous vehicles (1987-1995).

Also in the 1980s the DARPA-funded Autonomous Land Vehicle (ALV) in the United States achieved the first road-following demonstration that used laser radar (Environmental Research Institute of Michigan), computer vision (Carnegie Mellon University and SRI), and autonomous robotic control (Carnegie Mellon and Martin Marietta) to control a driverless vehicle up to 30km/h.

In 1994, the twin robot vehicles VaMP and Vita-2 of Daimler-Benz and Ernst Dickmanns
of UniBwM drove more than one thousand kilometers on a Paris three-lane
highway in standard heavy traffic at speeds up to 130 km/h, albeit
semi-autonomously with human interventions. They demonstrated
autonomous driving in free lanes, convoy driving, and lane changes left
and right with autonomous passing of other cars.

In 1995, Dickmanns´ re-engineered autonomous S-Class Mercedes-Benz took a 1600 km trip from Munich in Bavaria to Copenhagen in Denmark and back, using saccadic computer vision and transputers to react in real time. The robot achieved speeds exceeding 175 km/h on the German Autobahn,
with a mean time between human interventions of 9km, or 95% autonomous
driving. Again it drove in traffic, executing manoeuvres to pass other
cars. Despite being a research system without emphasis on long distance
reliability, it drove up to 158 km without human intervention.

In 1995, the Carnegie Mellon University
Navlab project achieved 98.2% autonomous driving on a 5000 km
(3000-mile) "No hands across America" trip. This car, however, was
semi-autonomous by nature: it used neural networks to control the
steering wheel, but throttle and brakes were human-controlled.

From 1996-2001, the Italian government funded the ARGO Project at University of Parma and Pavia University (coordinated by Prof. Alberto Broggi), which worked on enabling a modified Lancia Thema
to follow the normal (painted) lane marks in an unmodified highway. The
culmination of the project was a journey of 2,000 km over six days on
the motorways of northern Italy dubbed MilleMiglia in Automatico,
with an average speed of 90 km/h. 94% of the time the car was in fully
automatic mode, with the longest automatic stretch being 54 km. The
vehicle had only two black-and-white low-cost video cameras on board, and used stereoscopic vision
algorithms to understand its environment, as opposed to the "laser,
radar - whatever you need" approach taken by other efforts in the field.

Three US Government funded military efforts known as Demo I (US Army), Demo II (DARPA), and Demo III (US Army). Demo III (2001)^[1]
demonstrated the ability of unmanned ground vehicles to navigate miles
of difficult off-road terrain, avoiding obstacles such as rocks and
trees. James Albus at NIST provided the Real-Time Control System which is a hierarchical control system.
Not only were individual vehicles controlled (e.g. throttle, steering,
and brake), but groups of vehicles had their movements automatically
coordinated in response to high level goals.

In 2002, the DARPA Grand Challenge
competitions were announced. The competitions allowed international
teams to compete in fully autonomous vehicle races over rough unpaved
terrain and in a non-populated suburban setting.

More info on issues below could be obtained from Wikipedia.

• 3 Recent projects
  • 3.1 Fully autonomous
    • 3.1.1 Vehicles for paved roads
    • 3.1.2 Free-ranging military vehicles
  • 3.2 Pre-built infrastructure
    • 3.2.1 Dual mode transit - monorail
    • 3.2.2 Automated highway systems
    • 3.2.3 Free-ranging on grid
  • 3.3 Driver-assistance
    • 3.3.1 Sensorial-informative
    • 3.3.2 Actuation-corrective
    • 3.3.3 Systemic
• 4 Existing and missing technologies
  • 4.1 Sensors
  • 4.2 Navigation
  • 4.3 Motion Planning
  • 4.4 Control of vehicle
  • 4.5 Work done in simulation
• 5 Social issues
  • 5.1 Motivations
  • 5.2 Social Costs
• 6 Discussion & Future
• 7 Key players
  • 7.1 International
  • 7.2 Governments
  • 7.3 Universities and professional bodies
  • 7.4 Commercial interests
  • 7.5 Voluntary and hobbyist groups

——————————————————————————-

Google: ‘driverless car’ under Google Image

——————————————————————————

What do you think? Feel free to drop your opinion(s) or comment(s).

"Oops, I plagiarized Wikipedia"

This blog is dedicated to a prophet of God, named William Marrion Branham. The title is concerning one of the seven visions God gave to brother Branham. I have posted a similar post on this matter, under the title: "Prophesies…" and "Prophecies II" back in 16 April 2007.

As a brief introduction, William Marrion Branham, who is commonly known as brother Branham fo short, was given seven visions by God back in 1932. Till date, NONE of the visions given to him failed to come to pass. Those haven’t are just a matter of time.

This post is meant to refresh the previous posts and highlight the last interesting remaining visions. Six out of seven of his visions have all come to past, with the sixth vision being the exponential advancement of science and technology which led to the production of a fully automated and driverless car and cars will take on the shape of an egg. I have told many of my friends regarding this even back in Secondary (High) School. Some may have forgotten, some thought I was a "crack". To those who remember, I hope you’re able to see the reality of what I told you [based on William Branham's vision] today.

Vision given to him on United States of America: -

" This
nation is a woman’s nation; it’s marked by a woman. It’s a woman right down
through prophecy, everywhere; and number thirteen everywhere in prophecy It’s a
woman’s country; she has her liberties here. And she’ll ruin it; she’s the ruination
of the world. There will be in that time, during that time the woman will be
permitted to vote, and they’ll elect the wrong person (They did it on this last
election. That’s right.) which will start the stronghold. During that time
it’ll come to pass that–that there’ll be a great woman rise up in the United States

; she’ll be beautifully dressed (And I got in parenthesis,
perhaps the Catholic church. See?), that’ll take rulership over the power,
overpower the others in the United States

. She’ll be beautiful to look at, but she’ll be
cruel-hearted as she can be."

 "Then
I looked again, and I saw the United States just blowed to pieces. There wasn’t nothing left on
it. I
seen, looked like just stumps a-burning, rocks blowed out, and the whole United
States just looked bare, laying like that, as far as I could see where I was
standing."

Reverend William Branham lived from 1909-1965. He was born in Kentucky. Brother Branham isn’t an educated person, stopping at the 7th Grade. Through his speech highlighted in blue (above), I’m sure one can detect many grammatical mistakes. However, that doesn’t make him short of becoming a mighty prophet. God don’t see how educated one is; in fact, God doesn’t use educated people in a mighty way. Just in case Christian brethren get furious, read the Bible. David was a small-sized shepherd boy, Abraham was a shepherd too, John the Baptists lived in the wilderness wearing sheep skin, Peter was a fisherman and the lists goes on and on..

His visions alone is a good vindication that he is a seer/ prophet. Moreso, a prophecy is more or less defined as ‘predictions’, only in a supernatural sense.  Just going off track for a moment. A prediction is not the same as a prophecy. Science dwells on predictions. It’s logic-based, or more sophisticatedly, termed as "educated guesses". Prophecy is entirely different. Predictions require certain hints/information that could be obtained by experiment. Prophecy is out of this natural world. It just "come". Nobody knows how, but of course, Christians know why. Back to brother Branham’s story. What was ‘revealed’ to brother Branham cannot be a result of mere creative imagination. Reasons? Predicting an occurence of event in the future is hard enough. Placing more information in it, such as location, who is involved and the background scenario would reduce the chance of happenning to null. Unlike Nostrasamus whose "prophecies" are too general and could be applied to any event, brother Branham’s cant. It’s pretty straight forward. For example, USA (specific) was shown to him, not just "a country" (general). The president is a woman (specific gender). This woman will be beautifully dressed.

Today, we see Senator Hillary Clinton running for presidency. A woman running for presidency first time in the US history!

Brother Branham cannot be a false prophet. His visions are all vindicated and none failed. The real false prophets are the false Christians. Especially those dwelling on human sensation, thinking their gifts are from God, yet in reality are just carnal impersonations. False Christians can easilly fool the public into believing that their religion is true by displaying hypocritical attitudes (imitations of the fruits of the Spirit- gentle, joy, peace, longsuffering and etc.) and fake annointing. Fortunately, they ain’t gonna fool true Christians, the "Elect". It’s time for Christian individuals to get right with God and worry about their own salvation more than others. How can one win souls for Christ if his/her own life ain’t reflecting Christ? Don’t judge brother Branham if you don’t know him nor have read his sermons yourself. If ever there is a Malachi 4:5 to come, that scripture had long been fulfilled in brother Branham’s ministry.

If brother Branham’s vision comes to pass again, this prove that the God of Abraham, Isaac and Israel Who revealed this to him, is true and alive indeed. God is to be praised and worshipped not because we feel like doing it, but because He deserves it. Because He deserves it, we will do it.

WARNING: DON’T READ THIS IF YOU’RE NOT A CHRISTIAN AND/OR IF YOU FEEL OFFENDED BY CHRISTIAN DOCTRINES

That’s right. The topic which caught my attention today is about Daniel’s 70 weeks, taken from the book of Daniel Chapter 9, verses 20-27.

20     ¶  And whiles I was speaking, and praying, and confessing my sin and the sin of my people Israel, and presenting my supplication before the LORD my God for the holy mountain of my God;

DANIEL 9:21
     21    Yea, whiles I was speaking in prayer, even the man Gabriel, whom I had seen in the vision at the beginning, being caused to fly swiftly, touched me about the time of the evening oblation.

DANIEL 9:22
     22    And he informed me, and talked with me, and said, O Daniel, I am now come forth to give thee skill and understanding.

DANIEL 9:23
     23    At the beginning of thy supplications the commandment came forth, and I am come to shew thee; for thou art greatly beloved: therefore understand the matter, and consider the vision.

DANIEL 9:24
     24    Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy.

DANIEL 9:25
     25    Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times.

DANIEL 9:26
     26    And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.

DANIEL 9:27
     27    And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

As Christians we use to wonder, is God really unfair towards us? Why did He seems to favour the Jews from the beginning of time? It seems as if from creation until today, all of His attention was channelled to the Jews. Where is justice? It has always been Israel, Israel, and Israel…and will be Israel again soon…where do we Gentiles (non-Jews) stand in His heart and mind???

I was doing a little pondering on this matter when it came to my mind one afternoon. Yet in less than 10 minutes, I got the answer. Snap, and I saw a Just Being once again.

Now, from the creation of Adam to Noah was about 1000 years (1056 years to be accurate). From Adam to the day of flood which wiped out the Antediluvian Civilization was 1656 years. And from Adam to the birth of Abraham was 1948 years.

Now, what I want us to realize is, Abraham IS NOT A JEW. So is Isaac and Jacob. Jews simply means "Called out ones". You may ask, call out from what? Called out from Gentiles! That’s it, Gentiles! In simple terms, Adam was not a Jew. To be most accurate, Adam was neither Gentile nor Jew. But he’s definitely NOT A JEW. Israel began only after Jacob (the grandson of Abraham) came in the scene. Before Jacob, there was no Israel, as we all know that Israel is Jacob’s new name.

Now, so from the time of creation until the time of Abraham, Isaac (Abraham’s son) and Jacob (Abraham’s grandson) was roughly 2000 years. Then we see Jehovah dealt with Israel for another 2000 years. From the birth of Jacob/Israel until the birth of Jesus was another 2000 years.

Adam - Abraham, Isaac,Israel = 2000 years

Israel - Jesus = 2000 years

Jesus - present = 2000 years

Now, we all know that there is a time limit for the Gentile age. God’s grace won’t be with us forever. We all know one of these days, which is very, very soon (extremely soon, so soon that no words are able to depict how soon is this soon), God’s grace will be shifted back to Israel as a nation! That time, Gentiles can cry for God and there is no mercy left. But that’s not the point of this blog. This blog is just to aware us that God is just indeed. This is just my testimony, a revelation given to me. It’s personal. And I enjoy this revelation.

Adam (non-Jew, non-Gentile) - Abraham (non-Jew, non-Gentile) = 2000 years

Jacob/Israel (beginning of Jewish age) - Jesus (ending of Jewish age) = 2000 years

Jesus - present day (Gentile age) = 2000 years

Isn’t He fair? God dealt with non-Jew, non-Gentiles for 2000 years, then God dealt with the Jews for 2000 years, and finally, up to the present God has been dealing with us, Gentiles, for 2000 years!

How glorious? We Gentiles can’t blame God for being bias to the Jews, and the Jews can’t blame God for being bias to the Gentiles. Perfect harmony!

A prove that Abraham was not a Jew for those who are confused. Abraham was the father of the Jews, but that doesn’t makes him a Jew. Abraham was also the father of the Ismaelites (Arabs), which are classified as Gentiles. It should be clear now that we cannot call Abraham a Jew or a Gentile. Just is the Lord God Almighty, for He was cut off from His people to call a group of Gentiles (heathens to begin with) for His name’s sake. But now is the time of the end of our dispensation. Make yourselves ready!

Hello again..

Today I bear an interesting news for the Potter fans..

Below is a news article obtained from MSN News.

——————————————————————–

J.K. Rowling Outs Hogwarts Character

Harry Potter fans, the rumors are true: Albus Dumbledore, master wizard and Headmaster of Hogwarts, is gay. J.K. Rowling, author of the mega-selling fantasy series that ended last summer, outed the beloved character Friday night while appearing before a full house at Carnegie Hall.

After reading briefly from the final book, "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows," she took questions from audience members.

She was asked by one young fan whether Dumbledore finds "true love."

"Dumbledore is gay," the author responded to gasps and applause.

She then explained that Dumbledore was smitten with rival Gellert Grindelwald, whom he defeated long ago in a battle between good and bad wizards. "Falling in love can blind us to an extent," Rowling said of Dumbledore’s feelings, adding that Dumbledore was "horribly, terribly let down."

Dumbledore’s love, she observed, was his "great tragedy."

"Oh, my god," Rowling concluded with a laugh, "the fan fiction."

Potter readers on fan sites and elsewhere on the Internet have speculated on the sexuality of Dumbledore, noting that he has no close relationship with women and a mysterious, troubled past. And explicit scenes with Dumbledore already have appeared in fan fiction.

Rowling told the audience that while working on the planned sixth Potter film, "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince," she spotted a reference in the script to a girl who once was of interest to Dumbledore. A note was duly passed to director David Yates, revealing the truth about her character.

Rowling, finishing a brief "Open Book Tour" of the United States, her first tour here since 2000, also said that she regarded her Potter books as a "prolonged argument for tolerance" and urged her fans to "question authority."

Not everyone likes her work, Rowling said, likely referring to Christian groups that have alleged the books promote witchcraft.

Her news about Dumbledore, she said, will give them one more reason.

Copyright 2007 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Source: http://entertainment.msn.com/news/article.aspx?news=280397&affid=100055&mpc=2

Viewed on: 21 Oct 2007

———————————————————————————————-

<<click>>

Evolution says:

‘Okapi’ –> zebra or horse or izzit giraffes.

Judge for yourself…based on what Biology teaches us back in form 6/ A-Levels/ STPM or equivalents..

First there was this cute, little, short-neck primitive fella..

—————————————————————————————————

<<<Please CLICK for a LARGER picture>>>

——-
——-
——-
——-

——-

——-

—————————-

—————————-

——-
——-
——-
——-
——-
—————————-

…but due to environmental factors/stress/burden/shift, evolution had taken place…

For example,trees were ‘too tall’…the okapis had to ’stretch their necks’ to survive…

————————

—

—

—

—

—

————————

    Short neck buddies that couldn’t reach and eat leaves from tall trees were extinct…some became fossillized in rocks, and have led ’scientists’ to believe that they were modern-day animal ancesstors.

    Throughout millennia, those that had long necks became what we call "giraffes" of today…At some point in time, the "zebras" *poof-ed* in the scene…All because of evolution. Oh, nothing much is talked on the zebras in Biology textbooks by the way…So I can’t tell you their urban legend..People might say observe its legs.."Oh,zebra legs"..So what? Heard of the white tiger? Doesn’t suggest it came from zebra though..

So, as a result of evolution…the okapi "died-ed", and the below species came forth…

*poof*

—————————-

——

——-
——-
——-
——-
——-
——-
——-
—————————-

——-
——-
——-
——-
——-
—————————-

But got one drawback…

People discovered that "OKAPI", DID NOT evolved…even after "millions and millions of years"..please ponder on this fact..

This buddy (a living fossil) is still the same old short neck buddy who still stretches his neck to eat leaves in the forest of Congo..The photo i included is not a "photoshop" during my free time. Okapi is alive in American zoos. They were said to be alive in Congo in early 1900s,but scientists laugh till they roll on the floor…saying, "How could a fossil be possibly alive? Go wear glasses, maybe you saw a donkey…Go study more…Don’t talk rubbish…"

————————————————————————–
BUT THE OKAPI SANG A SONG: -

I was afraid, I was petrified…
Kept thinkin’ I could never live without you by my side;

But then I spent so many nights,

Thinkin’ how you did me wrong,

And I grew strong,

And I learn how to carry on..

I HAVE SURVIVED!

<<PLEASE CLICK THE ABOVE>>

Did I crumble?
Did you think I’d lay down and die?

I HAD surviveD. Hey hey.

——————————————————————————-

Evolution is FLAWED SCIENCE.

I know this is a hard statement…it’ll no doubt tigger a ‘holy war’ with the atheists hiding under the covering of "science" and "scientist"…

Frenz, Never EQUATE evolution to mutation of genes. ITS TWO DIFFERENT terms and concepts…The earlier is RELIGION, latter is SCIENCE. Bacteria do mutate..into stronger bacteria…but not into algae. YOGURT is not MILK. MILK is not CHEESE.

Okapi was okapi, and still is an okapi, and will be an okapi till the end of days..so were, and is and will be the giraffes and zebras.

————————————————————————————————

Another living fossil, thought to be the ancesstor of rats. This is even reported in news (Milius 2007).

The Laotian rock rat, which is very much [actually, it is not 'very much alive', it is] alive, belongs to a rodent
family that scientists had assumed had vanished 11 million years ago. This statement suggests that scientists like to assume more but prove less.
—————————

——
——
——
——
—————————
<<CLICK image to ENLARGE>>

ALIVE AND SNIFFING. An image from the first photo session with a living
Laotian rock rat, taken in 2006, comes from retired Florida State
University professor David Redfield, who, with biologist Uthai
Treesucon, set out on a personal quest to find the living animal.

"People think the world is explored, [but] it’s not," comments
mammalogist Darrin Lunde of the American Museum of Natural History in
New York City

It will be just a matter of time before more ‘prehistoric’ animals that were thought to have evoluted to ‘modern’ animals be found to remain unchange in phenotype (appearance). Don’t be fooled by the "hocus pocus" of good bed time story tellers (evolution authors).

—————————-

——-
——-
——-
——-
——-
——-
——-
——-
—————————-

Reference:

Susan Milius 2007, April. ‘Living Fossil: DNA puts rodent in family that’s not extinct after all‘. Science News, 171(17): 260.

Hello again friends..

How have y’all been doing lately? Brisbane is rather chilly, even at spring time.It began to rain a lot towards the end of winter, start of spring. Probably it’s due to warmer atmosphere (references needed! :-D)

Talking about references, this blog is dedicated to a controversial topic. No, not about politics and religion, but science, however what I am about to type has no credible sources of info, due to its nature of being controvercial. So you people will be left with 2 choices at the end of the read:

1) Believe it (by faith of other people’s work, not backed up by "creditable American scientific journals"

2) Doubt it (because scientists of the "American scientific journals" says otherwise)

3) Curiosity takes over you! And a quest to find the answers for yourself overwhelms you.

So that none of us end up in confusion, I shall approach this matter systematically.

——————————————————————————–

TITLE:

Dinosaurs Exists Alongside Human Beings Thousands to hundreds of Years Ago

INTRODUCTION

Currently, almost every student who study Biology are being taught the topic evolution. Basically, evolution involves the aspect of "appearance" of a new [species of] life form from an existing species of life form, where both lifeforms are distinct in appearance and/or genetic makeups; the rule of thumb for this to occur in the animal kingdom is that it requires a time span of "millions and millions of years".  Evolution can be said as a hybrid of a few branches of sciences such as genetics and embryology just to name a few. But above all, evolution is one of the most important tool used by a group of atheist with scientific education (technically making them "scientists") to disprove a creation event and the existence of God the Creator in the name of science.

As far as science is concern, science touches on "How" an event occur rather than "why". The very foundation of evolution is based upon probability (a field of mathematics). However, has it come to your attention that the knowledge of "why" an event occur is acknowledged by "how" and not vice versa? For example, during the process of making a sword, a blacksmith would carry out a few processes such as metal smelting, molding, cooling and etc. From a scientific perspective, all that is explained is how smelting, molding, cooling and etc. occur. It does not show the wide picture of why smelt, mold, cool and etc. However, if one would to know the "why smelt, mold, cool and etc", then knowledge of how to smelt, mold, cool and etc would not only make all sense but also tally and flowing with the very idea of "why" without contradiction(s). I hope this is not confusing.

Throughout the years, the theory of the ‘origin of life’ has been changed many times in the aspect of time-span. Back in the 1800s, the Westerners believe that lifeforms on earth originate about few thousand years ago. After Charles Darwin (father of evolution) came on the scene,the existence of lifeforms exponentially grew to few millions of years, and today, few billions. All to suite the theory of evolution. How? Evolution is governed by the theory that everything is based on chance and probability. However, if a man could prove that all things happen for a reason, then the entire idea of evolution is jeopardized. We have to bear in mind that "every journey begins with a single step". So is the evolution theory, its first move would be "time and probability"- that is to say, if one can prove that life-forms began only a few thousand years ago, or things (or events) happen for a reason, evolution MUST be flawed at that very instant, and this theory must be rejected according to the ethics of science.

Switching scenario to dinosaurs now. Dinosaur is perceived as a reptile that exists 65 million years ago. The current model of evolution states that human and other mammals (hot blooded animals) "evolved" due to the extinction of the great dinosaurs which once roamed/dominated the earth. Human being on the other hand, only evolved about 200 thousand years ago. What would happen when someone came out with a theory that "dinosaurs and men once lived alongside each other"? What does it suggests should evidence point that that scenario did occurred only a few hundred years ago? Would it shake the entire theory of "one species evolved to another" over a long period of time? Would it suggests that the modern method of Carbon dating had a loop hole or results in "inaccuracy"?

FINDINGS AND DISCUSSIONS

Back in the 1930’s ceremonial burial stones of the ancient Incan civilization were discovered in numerous ancient Inca tombs located in Ica, Peru. Uniquely, these artifacts had carvings of dinosaur-like lizards and men. To read more, please go to : http://www.omniology.com/IcaPeruDinoArt.html and/or http://www.creationists.org/livedinos01.html. These artifacts are definitely not fakes. Even if one insist on saying that they are fake, reality would say,"Modern man do not have the time nor knowledge to carve stones like that". Moreso, only a few species of dinosaurs were identified back in 1930 as dinosaur fossil records were limited back then. If you examine the pictures, you’ll notice that the variety of dinosaurs carved on the stones had a bunch of variety from T-rex to bi/tri-ceratops.

As a brief introduction, the Incan civilization, which existed at around 1200-1500 AD was a great civilization in South America. The Incan people are advance for their age, especially in the field of agriculture. They had terraced (staircase like) plantations on hills, pyramids (like Egypt) to bury their rulers, aqueducts for water supply, constructed tunnels and paved roads (like Rome) . History has it that the people of this civilization even know how to conduct "brain surgery" as they are quite advance in medicine at that time. However, like Malacca and most other Eastern ancient civilization, they fell into the hands of the Europeans (Spanish in this case).If you are interested to know more about Incan History, please visit: http://lsa.colorado.edu/~lsa/texts/Incas.html or http://www.wsu.edu/~dee/CIVAMRCA/INCAS.HTM . Existence of burial stones in a civilization that built pyramid is neither something "new", amazing nor surprising.

So the point is, the Incan people who have just been introduced, made burial stones for tombs, and the burial stones contain pictures of dinosaurs and human being. Based on the pictures, the dinosaurs were as much active as the human were. This actively suggests that ancient Peruvian men lived alongside dinosaurs hundreds of years ago. Thus this would disprove the theory of extinction of dinosaur gave rise to the evolution of many other mammals, including human. Rather it may suggests that when there were dinosaurs, there were men; not cavemen but civilized men. So here we strike 2 birds: dinosaur existed (not extinct-ed) during ancient civilizations, and probably extinct as close as few hundred years ago.

If this is true, Biology textbooks worldwide would have to be re-written, else Biology would cease from being a science by embracing "fiction". Whatever "facts" or "evidences" that suggest a huge asteroid hit the earth 65 million years ago which wiped out the dinosaurs entirely- would have to be re-examined in a different light by raising more plausible alternative theories. Recently, a researcher from the UK (being an evolutionist herself) has found that mammals did existed in the time of dinosaurs (just type it on Google Search to read the abstract). However, rather than embracing the fact that dinosaurs aren’t extinct millions of years ago, the scientific simply pushed backward the date when mammals "arrive". Their action clearly show that science if full of assumptions, not solid facts.

CONCLUSION

Although one would argue that science is at its peak currently, all evidence point to the contrary Modern science is probably just at its infancy. Although it may attempt to answer how, but it is still far away from explaining why. Should science reaches its peak  hundreds or thousands of years from now (if the earth still exists, but it seems highly unlikely due to exponential human growth and diminishing resources), what would happen if all findings just point to one thing- faith did explained everything afterall: there is a Creator. All the resources- money, natural resource, intelligence, energy etc.-spent are all wasted just to confirm what would have otherwise been accepted a long long time ago: faith.

———————————————————————————-

This is just my personal belief:

With each discovery of scientific laws of nature, the answer draws closer to the existence of The Creator.

As for faith matters, or some would want to term it as religion, I would say that it can be seen as such. At the beginning, there was this Great Intellectual Being, Source of the laws of the universe, a Thing containing Life force, having creative poweres, living in eternity where time is yet to exist. Being at the state of eternity, a state of timeless-ness, this One would be able to see the end from the beginning, and beginning from the end. This One was lonely, but had many Attributes to be expressed.Having creative powers, this One wants to multiply and interact. Since this One is self existence, the only way would be to create "children" in Its order and likeness. By doing so, The One would be known as: The Father of Life.

However, a Being in the dimension of thoughts or attributes are intangible. Nobody can see, smell, hear, taste and feel thoughts/ attributes. So The Father of Life created another dimension where things could be tangible/sensable by human senses.

What is "real", in human perspectives, would be the physics: something tangible/ sensable by human senses…a.k.a. Science. However, at the end of the day, one must not forget even science is a form of knowledge, a thought, which is also "real". It all goes back to the un-sense-able-by-human senses-dimension…a.k.a. "spiritual" dimension. Hence my personal belief would be the "physical" is an attribute of the "spiritual". Science would have to agree and fall in line with Faith at the end of time, not separate these majestic two.

Cheers

I have stumbled across certain quotes online, by Malaysians, for Malaysians. I’m just plain plagiarizing here, and if this would be a uni assignment, i’ll be penalized.

Question: Go back and read you Sejarah textbook about things (legislations) that were drafted in 1957 by the builders of Malaysia.

"We are living in a globalized world. No country in the world will pity us or set "quota" for us when facing the global challenge. We are no longer competing amongst ourselves. Look outside the box, you’ll see that we’re competing with other countries for survival. What our forefathers built is for their time, not ours."

"That’s why our ex-PM kept urging us to have 20/20 vision"

 Bro. Branham (26.3.1953) Israel At The Red Sea. Jeffersonville, Indiana

….Just before that time comes, that automobiles… Which was built that old straight back, twenty years ago or twenty-five years ago. You can remember twenty years anyhow. I said, "They’ll look like an egg. They’ll be shaped. That’s a vision. Be something on the shape of something like that." And that’s the way they’ll be just before the rapture……

Faith Once Delivered To the Saints. (1.5.1955) Chicago, Il.

…..And I said, "Just before the end time comes…" Now remember, I still say this: "Before the end time comes…" Wrote twenty-three years ago. "Before the end time comes, there’ll be a woman, that’ll be a great ruler in this nation. She will either be president or something on that order, some great woman. And at that time, automobiles, just before the coming of the Lord, will be in the shape of an egg." Now, remember that; keep it in mind. See? That was in 1932, or something like that. And look how they’re shaping down every year, right to it. We’re nearer the end time; we are…..

William Branham. (9.3.1957) Jehovah Jireh preached in Phoenix Arizona.

…."There’ll come a time… America is a woman’s nation. And a woman will rise up, soon, in America, and become a great person, like a president or somewhere, before the coming of the Lord, I believe. See? Just remember that, that I’ve said that. And cars will become more like an egg shape, just before the total annihilation or the destruction comes to this nation."….

1960. Jeffersonville, Indiana…

1932, As I was on my way… Or as I was getting ready to go on my way
to church this morning, it came to pass that I fell into a vision. Our
services was being held on Meigs Avenue at the old orphans’ home, where
Charlie Kern lives in part of the building." (He lives just across the
street now, you know.)
And it came to pass that while I was in this vision I seen some
dreadful things take place. I speak this in the Name of the Lord.
The president which now is, President Franklin D. Roosevelt… (Now remember, this is twenty-eight years ago.) will
cause the whole world to go to war; and the new dictator of Italy,
Mussolini, shall make his first invasion towards Ethiopia, and he will
take Ethiopia; but that’ll be his last. He shall come to his end.We
will be in war with Germany. Watch Russia. (Now, that’s…) Communism, Nazism, and Fascism… Watch Russia. But that is not the main one to watch.
It shall–also has been an evil thing done in
this country; they have permitted women to vote. This is a woman’s
nation, and she will pollute this nation as Eve did Eden.

Now, you see why I’m hammering the way I do. I got, THUS SAITH THE LORD.
In her voting she will elect the wrong person. The Americans will take a great beating at a place that Germany will build, which will be a great wall built of concrete (The Maginot Line, eleven years before it was ever built.) But finally they will be victors.
Then when these women help elect the wrong
person, then I seen a great woman rise up in the United States,
well-dressed and beautiful, but cruel in heart. She will either guide
or lead this nation to ruination. (I’ve got in parenthesis "perhaps Catholic church.")

Also, science will progress, especially in the
mechanical world. Automobiles will continue to get like egg shape.
Finally they will build one that won’t need a steering wheel. (They’ve got it now.) It will be controlled by some other power.
Then I seen the United States as one smoldering, burnt-over place. It will be near the end.

William Branham. (8.12.1960).Thyatirean Church Age. Jeff, Indiana

"…
it’ll come to pass that science will be inventing great things. When they do,
they’ll make an automobile, and automobiles will continually shape down (You
know what they looked like in ‘33, now they…), they’ll become like eggs, look
like an egg. For I seen on a highway, a great master highway, a car going down
the road that didn’t have any steering wheel in it. It was controlled by a
power."

 "This
nation is a woman’s nation; it’s marked by a woman. It’s a woman right down
through prophecy, everywhere; and number thirteen everywhere in prophecy It’s a
woman’s country; she has her liberties here. And she’ll ruin it; she’s the ruination
of the world. There will be in that time, during that time the woman will be
permitted to vote, and they’ll elect the wrong person (They did it on this last
election. That’s right.) which will start the stronghold. During that time
it’ll come to pass that–that there’ll be a great woman rise up in the United States; she’ll be beautifully dressed (And I got in parenthesis,
perhaps the Catholic church. See?), that’ll take rulership over the power,
overpower the others in the United States. She’ll be beautiful to look at, but she’ll be
cruel-hearted as she can be."

 "Then
I looked again, and I saw the United States just blowed to pieces. There wasn’t nothing left on
it. I
seen, looked like just stumps a-burning, rocks blowed out, and the whole United
States just looked bare, laying like that, as far as I could see where I was
standing."

William Branham (24.7.1960). Unchangeable Word of God.

Lakeport,California.

 See these ladies. Excuse me,
sisters, please do, just a minute. Just lay your conscience aside a minute. You
listen to your doctor. I ought to be as much; I’m your brother. But a woman out
here to be mother, walking around with see them little, old shorts and things
like that, it’s a disgrace to the nation, to the flag, to human race, to
anything else. A cigarette in her hand walking like that… Oh, my, my, my…

 If–if this is the Holy Spirit I
have, you’ll have very little chance to ever make it even to the door. And
that’s right. God hates that. Yes, sir. That’s the lowest thing a woman ever
done when she started smoking cigarettes. And you husbands that will let her do
it, well, I’ve got my opinion of you. That’s exact… You’re not the boss of
your house, no indeed.

 I don’t say my wife won’t do it;
but when she does, she won’t be Mrs. William Branham. That will be one thing
sure. Yes indeedy, I don’t say my daughters won’t do it. But you just look up
their back and see how many blisters is on them when it gets through. That’s
exactly right. I don’t say they won’t do it; I don’t know. God holds the
future. I hope I don’t desire something like that. That’s right. I don’t know
what will happen.

 But listen, when that worse fifth
columnist reason in the nation is a cigarette smoking mother… I get
statistics from the government. It says that eighty percent of the mothers that
smoke cigarettes has to put their babies on cows’ milk if they smoke. If they
get the nicotine poison from the milk, they don’t live eighteen months. Think
of that. Sabotage…

Oh, as I’ve always said, "It
isn’t the robin that picks the apple that hurts it, it’s the worm at the core
that kills it." That’s right. It’s our own dirt and filth around…

 Them cigarette companies try and
make women think they reduced; it’s giving you a TB and cancer. Don’t the
doctors tell you that? Don’t listen to all this. How do they take that stuff
and–and put it out there on television and–and then write it off out in the
United States government taxes, and then take a preacher and send him to
penitentiary for not paying taxes on something another he’s… Oh, my. We’re
ripe for damnation. There’s nothing left but judgment. That’s right.

 She (USA) isn’t very old. Revelations 13
said this nation wouldn’t live very long, anyhow. You know that. The little
lamb raised up and never did come a ram like the rest of them. It died in its
youth. That’s right. When the ecclesiastical power and civil powers met
together with those two little horns of the ram, then united church and state…
And we’re almost doing it right now. It just depends on which way the wave
blows when they have another election. And we’re almost at it right now. Just
let it go ahead.

 You might think I’m a fanatic, but
you write it down on that little piece of paper somewhere, and stick it away in
your Bible, and watch one of these days. It’s coming. She might be right at the
door. You better pray. You better get right with God. The hour is at hand.

 And we see nations breaking,

Israel

awakening, the signs that the Bible foretold. Gentile days
numbered, with horror encumbered. Oh return, O dispersed, to your own. Oh, my.
Get away from these things of the world and get to God as quick as you can.
It’s the only hope that we have, the only thing that’s left. Every nation is
ready to be blown to bits; the end time is at hand. …….(the sermon goes on)

 
William Branham. (23.8.1964) Questions and Answers-Jeffersonville, Indiana.

"And it shall come to pass,
that before the end time shall come, that automobiles will take on the shape of
an egg, become more like an egg. And I saw an American family driving down a
highway in a car that… They were setting facing one another, and had a table,
and were, look like, playing checkers or cards. And they didn’t have any
steering wheel in the car. And it was controlled by some power without a
steering wheel. How many remembers me prophesying that (See?), that’s been
here?

 Now, at the World’s Fair they’ve
already got the car on the market. Here is the… It’s sold now; some big
company has taken many of them. And this car, here it is. Paul Boyd remembered
the prophecy, looked into his book what I’d said, and took the picture in
there. And there it is, exactly in the form of an egg, with two seats setting
that way, and two setting this way, and a table setting in the middle to play
the cards and things on, just exactly.

1960’s

1980’s

2005

2006

Left: Volkswagen "Smart Car"
Right: Driverless taxi

2007

"Cars are becoming more like an egg." Today this prophecy has been fulfilled…

UK scientists release plans for driverless car- http://www.itnews.com.au/newsstory.aspx?CIaNID=48578&eid=3&edate=20070327

Evolution…what is it really??

    Let me try to explain it to the best of my knowledge based on my shallow understanding. We were taught that there were many factors that lead to evolution. Basically, the sole foundation of the "evolution theory" begins with ONE key word: GENETICS…
    No worries, let’s see how the creativity of scientists can lead, or rather MISLEAD, always bear in mind that there may be (or rather definitely has and always has) more than 1 solution to any problems regarding life.
    Factors of evolution: -
1. Genetic Mutation
2. Natural Selection
Well…there are many others…but then, can;t remember them for now.

Darwin was a fine Englishmen who sailed around the world..once upon a time…Long story short, his message was that all finches in the world came from one ONE finch. Due to the need to adapt to new diets and weather, they’ve developed different abilities and morphology (physical shape or looks). Those who fed on nuts had stronger and larger beaks compared to those that feed on seeds. The idea is, the once small-beak finch had no choice but to feed on nuts…so somehow, they had to train on nut-eating everyday and somehow, this passed on their traits to the young..

Comment:
False. Size of beaks are not a result of evolution. Birds that have big beaks today is not a result of their parents growing big beaks. Oh, come on, a dad may be Mr. Universe or a wife Ms. Universe…but that doesn’t mean the son be super macho, he may be just another graceful sissy boy while his sister a pork-chop..This has been proven, observable and this is observation CAN produce repeatable results…Now, THIS is science.

WELL, what happened was this instead:

    Reproduction results in a GREAT variety. Thats normal. No 2 human beings are exactly alike due to what we understand as a product of "variation". Having different looks doesn’t mean that certain species are of different species..such as a rottweiler VS a chiwawa VS a siberian husky vs say…a wolf or…a hyena…ohh, different species…but still dogs…so what makes a dog, dog i wonder…Come on, this ain’t no evolution, it is just a matter of variation.
    You know, it’s so cool…I wonder how many of you guys have heard of this? Some bunch of scientists proclaim (with pride) that whites came from blacks…and blacks came from monkeys…gee…what’s happening to our education system I wonder..
    If you’ve made evolution your religion, do read this article..

http://www.ndtv.com/morenews/showmorestory.asp?slug=Woman+gives+birth+to+black+and+white+twins&id=95429
Friday, October 27, 2006 (Middlesborough):

A British woman has defied one-in-a-million odds to give birth to black and white twins.

Baby
Kaydon has dark hair, brown eyes and brown skin, while his brother
Layton is blonde-haired, blue-eyed with pale skin. The mother is of
English-Nigerian heritage and the babies’ father is caucasian.

"When
they came out, they were born white. Although Kaydon has the dark hair,
his skin colour was white, and it was like, gradually, when he got
older that his skin colour started to change."

"But as he was
getting darker, and his features were getting darker, Layton was
getting lighter and his hair was getting blonder and his eyes went
blue," said Kerry Richardson.

Another story:

A mixed-race British mom gave birth to twins recently — one of each. No, not a boy and a girl. Two girls — one black, the other white. The odds of such a birth are about a million to one, experts said.

"It was a shock when I realized that my twins were two different
colors," Kylie Hodgson, 19, told London’s Daily Mail. "But it doesn’t
matter to us — they are just our two gorgeous little girls."

Hodgson and her partner, Remi Horder, 17, were both born to mixed-race
parents. Little Kian and Remee share a love of apples and the
Teletubbies, their proud mom says. Fertility experts speculate that a
sperm containing all-white genes fused with an egg with all-white
genes, and a sperm with all-black genes fused with an all-black gene
egg to produce the fraternal twins.

Comment:
Seems to me that technically, human beings are also experiencing "DEVOLUTION" too!

My point…Adam and Eve do exists! They carried with them a whole complete set of human genes being the original creation.